Coronavirus
April 2, 2020
The impact of this coronavirus, COVID-19, can’t be understated. The health impact has been great and economic impact profound. As I write this, over 1 million people worldwide have tested positive for COVID-19 and 244,000 in the US alone. 53,000 deaths in the world and 6,000 in the states. It’s not a hoax or a joke, and perhaps the larger impact is the degree of hospitalization required for those fighting the virus. Because this has been a worldwide event, supplies of both basic protective and lifesaving equipment have been in short supply. I have no reason to doubt the governors and nurses and doctors who say they do not have the materials they need. This is not the most contagious virus, or most deadly, but it’s still overwhelming our capacity for treatment.
We have entered an unlikely, unprecedented period of self-isolation. Previous examples might include London during WWII, or Houston before and immediately after Hurricane Harvey. But this is so widespread. Almost everyone in the world, except the most remote, will be under a stay-at-home order at some point. And this has all happened within the last month or so. It is another month or two (May or June 2020) before experts think we can start to go back to normal.
The result of isolation has, not surprisingly, caused massive upheaval in the marketplace. Obviously, this is a secondary concern to the very real health risks of the virus, but when money quits moving and people start losing jobs, an economic crisis quickly leads to a health crisis. Access to safe shelter, food and medical care is paramount to keeping people healthy. This is the argument that some have made to support a return to normal. It could be the subject of a cost/benefit study, if our medical facilities and staff weren’t already reporting being overrun. We do not currently have the capability to safely treat those who are sick with this new coronavirus in addition to those afflicted with other conditions.
So we’ve ‘locked down’ most of the country. Similar orders have kept people inside all over the world. An economic standstill of this magnitude has occurred only a couple times in modern history. It’s not hard to see why we’re here now. I think of ‘the economy’ as how fast money changes hands. In a good economy, it’s spinning all over the world at rapid speed. A slump in any industry impacts the whole economy because money quits moving amongst those affected. This pandemic has effectively stopped the flow through restaurants, movie theaters, retail, other small businesses, and more. When businesses don’t make revenue, they can’t pay rent to their landlords, who can’t pay the banks, who report decreased earnings and increased foreclosures and stock price goes down. But more importantly is those who work at these establishments. These are the people that put almost every dollar of their income back into the economy through groceries, rent, entertainment, etc.. When these people lose their income, the local economy takes a massive hit and quickly drags on the national economy.
What we’ve found, and what is still the case, is that the United States Government is the greatest economic force in history. Even with massive spending and enormous debts, institutions worldwide believe in the US Dollar and Treasury Bonds as safe haven. This should be both exploited and protected. The US has the ability to float unfathomable amounts of money to those affected by this virus. And to it’s credit, it has already started to do so. With appropriate oversight, much of this can be recouped via very low interest loans, with only some of it described as a handout. The government’s role in this is to keep money changing hands. We help restaurateurs, they keep paying their staff, who keeps paying their rent and buying groceries. This all keeps money changing hands, and the economy in general.
The government direct payment of $1200 is more correctly titled relief rather than stimulus. The jobs have gone away, while the rent and groceries stay the same. There’s nowhere to spend the money if people wanted. Correctly learning from the 2008 bailout, government money is tied to the continued employment of those impacted. The slow trickle of an economy we’re experiencing in these times is predicated on people being able to access the basic necessities. The eventual recovery is dependent on regular people being employed and spending money locally and also over the internet. An economic stimulus would have to happen after everything has opened back up. Calling anything a ‘stimulus’ right now would be incorrect as many businesses are shuttered.
This discussion has been focused on the economic impacts of the global pandemic happening now. It’s important to continue to follow advice given at a local and national level. The spread of this coronavirus has been slowed by these measures, the spread of seasonal flu has been slowed by our actions. After shutting down a large part of this country, the only reasonable resolution is to continue doing what is working and slowing or otherwise mitigating the virus spread.
Our Two "Sense"
You will be able to find a unique take on today's most intriguing story lines in sports. You will find strong opinions on Iowa State University athletics as well as stories related to our favorite teams. We hope you can find a little bit of everything here. Our goals isn't to provide the most politically correct and standard response you might find on more traveled sites. Here you will find a fresh, logical and unique take, better know as "Our Two Sense".
Thursday, April 2, 2020
Tuesday, March 8, 2016
Cubs Spring Training Storylines Part 1
How will the Cubs work Schwarber into the mix at catcher?
It's important for the Cubs to continue working Schwarber behind the plate. It won't be his everyday spot going forward I don't believe and I'm also not sure they want him catching 120 games a year either. However his bat at the catcher spot is hard to find. If they can continue to work with him back there so he has the ability to be a part-time serviceable catcher it could pay dividends for years to come. I envision Schwarber getting 20-30 starts behind the plate this year. Let's face it, he isn't that good of a LF and the more starts he gets behind the plate the more starts Soler can get in the OF. It is important with all of the flexibility on this Cubs roster that they don't have one or two players with the inability to move around the diamond outside of Rizzo. Here are some other outside the box ways of getting Schwarber some C time.
-Personal catcher for Hendricks/5th starter
-Late inning substitution in blowouts
-Starts w/Ross or Montero as late inning def replacement
Finally, without knowing if Contreras is ready to play big league ball Schwarber needs the experience in case of injury to Montero.
Saturday, January 30, 2016
Big 12/SEC Challenge
As we reach the end of January and the heart of the conference slate the Big 12 and SEC are gearing up for an inter conference showdown. The coaches hate this challenge being in the middle of the conference season and I don't blame them. As a college basketball fan I think it's great. This challenge wouldn't have had nearly the buzz on a Tuesday night in early December before Simmons and Hield proved themselves to be the best two players in college basketball. It would be fun if more conferences did this on the same weekend. They could even do it the weekend of the Super Bowl and cal it Super Madness? They may not want to compete with the NFL so maybe Pro Bowl weekend is best. Anyway, I'll attempt to preview the ten games and make an accurate prediction.
One thing to keep in mind with this challenge is it includes all Big 12 teams and excludes the bottom four SEC teams.
West Virginia at Florida (-1.5)
The loss of Holton hurts for West Virginia. Florida is starting to play better as of late and is at home in this one. My hope is West Virginia is able to find enough offense to scrape out a win on the road and keep their Top 10 status for Tuesday's showdown in Hilton.
I think Press Virginia causes enough havoc and edges out a 2.5 hour win 71-66.
Vanderbilt at Texas (-1)
Vanderbilt is a good team. Texas is starting to find its way on both sides of the ball. Texas has about as many quality wins as anyone in the country. I think Shaka gets them another one today in a faster paced game.
Texas 81 Vanderbilt 76
Ole Miss at Kansas State (-7)
I admittedly don't know much about Ole Miss outside of Stefan Moody and that they are no long we appointment television like they used to be with Marshall Henderson. Kansas State as a seven point favorite is enough to convince me the young Wildcats will pull it out.
Kansas State 67 Ole Miss 60
Iowa State at Texas A&M (-4.5)
This turned out to be a much bigger opponent than we all originally thought before the season started. It still would have been really fun to see Kentucky come in to Hilton with the roster ISU currently has.
TAMU is good, very good. They are favored for a reason but the homer in me sees the Cyclones pulling this out. It will be interesting to see how much and how well Jameel McKay plays in this one. The Aggies have a talented freshman center. If Niang gets matched up on him though in a small ball game I think he can take his lunch.
I look for the Cyclones to mix up some more zone in this game and see how the Aggies respond. I think this one goes similar to Oklahoma game in Norman but this time the Cyclones slow it down enough and control the game toward the end to pull out a win.
Iowa State 79 Texas A&M 71
Texas Tech at Arkansas (-5.5)
Texas Tech is better than people think. Tubby has them trending in the right direction and Zach Smith is an athletic freak. However I think Arkansas backs up their big win Wednesday with a home win over Texas Tech.
Arkansas 81 Texas Tech 67
Oklahoma at LSU (+4.5)
This matchup turned out like gold for ESPN. The best two players in college basketball matchup in this one. LSU is much better now that they are healthy. Simmons will get his, as will Hield but I have a hard time believing that Jones can out scheme Krueger. It will be a fun one. OU hits 13 3's and maintains their #1 ranking.
Oklahoma 85 LSU 76
Georgia at Baylor (-11.5)
Georgia isn't very good. Baylor is. This one gets ugly and doesn't need any more analysis.
Baylor 79 Georgia 61
Tennessee at TCU (+1.5)
I wish Tennessee was going back to Texas. Maybe next year. TCU misses Kyan Anderson big time. They just aren't very good this year. I think Rick Barnes notches a win at TCU. Something his former school couldn't do.
Tennessee 65 TCU 60
Kentucky at Kansas (-5.5)
What a dynamite matchup this was preseason. Is this another year where Kentucky falls out of the Top 10 only to gain steam and wind up in the Final Four? Kansas has some issues right now. Will Self continue to hold his diaper dandies hostage on the bench or turn them loose in order to reap the rewards in March? It might be in KU's best interest to feed them to the wolves and risk ending their conference championship steak. I don't think Self will though. It's tough to bet against KU at the Phog but I think this ends up as the most exciting game of the challenge.
Kansas 74 Kentucky 72
Oklahoma State at Auburn (+1.5)
Remember the first Big12/SEC Challenge when ISU ran all over Auburn? That was pre Bruce Pearl. Auburn isn't there yet but they are going to be soon. Juwan Evans vs Kareem Canty will be a matchup to watch in this one. I think Bruce Pearl and Auburn sweat out a win in this one at home.
Auburn 80 Okie State 75
Final Tally
Big 12 6 SEC 4
Saturday, January 16, 2016
Fixing the Cyclones
There is an old saying the goes something like "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". While this may have been Steve Prohm's strategy coming into this year with extremely high expectations, he may have to rethink this strategy. Let me be clear, this team isn't "broke" but they certainly aren't performing at maximum efficiency. After losing 3 out of 4 fans have become restless and "experts" (and I use that term loosely) have begun to dig through this team with a fine tooth comb. Things are never as bad as they seem (or good for that matter), but the Cyclones have some things they need to figure out before getting back to their winning ways.
Adjusting Expectations
Expectations are a funny thing. The higher they are as a fan, the more miserable you generally become. The higher the expectations, the less room there is to outperform them. As a Cubs fan, last season was incredibly enjoyable. The Cubs weren't supposed to be a playoff team yet. They outperformed their expectations and it made it a blast to watch. This year, the expectations will be much higher. Losses will hurt more and wins won't feel as good because they are supposed to win. This year, the fans that follow ISU basketball have fallen victim to their own expectations. During the summer the fan base was buzzing with Big 12 championship and Final Four talk. It only gained more steam in a snowball effect as experts came out with their projected Final Four participants and preseason Top 10 lists. ISU climbed all the way up to #2 in the polls and even earned a couple first place votes while compiling wins in the non-conference that weren't convincing enough for the fan base. So, after 3 losses in 4 games have fans adjusted their expectations? Yes, they have. Some are calling this team a bubble team and would be surprised to see them make the tournament. What?! Look the 'Clones are probably out of the Big 12 regular season championship talk. That could be a blessing in disguise. Lets look at some realistic expectations going forward.
The NCAA tournament is a complete crap shoot. The very nature of this caused havoc on Cyclone Nation last March and could cause euphoria this March. Its just the way it is. I think its tough to put expectations on a team that say they should advance to a certain round in the NCAA tournament. For me, I think you can gauge a lot about a season based on the seed they earn in the big dance. Can we reset the goals on the year? Sure, I am going to (for myself anyway). How about a Top 4 finish in the Big 12? I've wanted nothing more than for the Cyclones to dethrone the Jayhawks over this fun four-five year run. They are behind the 8-ball this year. Maybe this leads to less heartache later in the year? How about a "protected" Top 4 seed in the NCAA tournament. The last two years they have been a 3 seed. Granted they have run the table in the Big 12 tournament but this team is still certainly capable of earning a 4 seed in the Big Dance. There are still 14 conference games and a non-conference tilt against Texas A&M left on the schedule. You can look at that as daunting or opportunity. Let's not beat around the bush, this group plays big when the lights are the brightest. Get in the tournament with a somewhat favorable draw and let the cards play themselves out.
Depth
I've never been a big "depth" guy in college basketball. With egos as big as they are, I think it can create more problems than it can solve. That is why I wasn't terribly concerned with the lack of depth coming into the year barring injury. Well, injury happened and it happened to a key cog in the offense and defense. When it comes to an 18 game conference season it has and will rear its ugly head a couple of times. I think it has become a factor with the defense and with some shooting woes (namely Monte Morris). It has made the margin for error thin and those small errors have shown up the last few games. They won't every game, that is my point. This group can score with the best of them and there will be nights when depth, defense and coaching won't come into play. With as bad as the defense and depth have been we are still talking about a couple bounces from 15-1. Hopefully Burton and Cooke start to find their way. Last year there were a couple of games that they don't win without Abdel Nader off the bench. Burton just about provided that spark at Oklahoma. Hopefully he can help close the deal a couple of times over the rest of the season.
Defense
Oh boy. It has been bad recently. Like, Sandlot 2 bad. We knew going into the season it wouldn't be great and it doesn't have to be great. It just has to be average. There are some bad defenders in the bunch, namely Georges Niang. We were convinced Prohm would put his defensive fingerprint on this group. The problem is that he has never been a defensive guru. Under Hoiberg, the plan was to funnel everything to long two point shots. If they get to the rim, they would be meeting Jameel McKay for a block party. Prohm has McKay denying out on the wings and guarding athletics big men away from the basket. This is not his forte. McKay won his Big 12 Defensive Player of the Year award by getting blocks in help defense. I think they need to get back to this in a way. I wouldn't mind seeing a few possessions of zone defense or some other form of junk defense. If they can create enough confusion a couple possessions a game for the opponent to "waste" a trip down the floor that might be just enough for the Cyclones to be able to outscore opponents. Last, dating back to the Chris Babb era ISU would try to eliminate one player a game from the other team by shadowing him for the entire game and not helping off him. Part of the reason ISU has given up so many three pointers this season is their rotations are late and they are left scrambling. Maybe if they aren't helping off one person they end up giving up a two instead of a three or they take a team out of their rhythm by taking away a first, second or third option. Once again, I think there is a solution or maybe even a band-aid good enough to help this team get to where it wants to be. This will never be an elite defensive team, but they don't have to be. Currently, the only thing they are taking away are opponent free throws. I'm asking to just take away one more thing, whatever that might be.
Offense
I agree with some that say the offense hasn't looked as potent as it has in the past, but I think a majority of that comes the fact they aren't shooting as well (or as often) from three point range. I also don't think they are running the break as well as they have in past years. At the end of the day they still have one of the most potent offenses in the country. I think there will be some regression to the mean when it comes to shooting percentages (in a good way) for the likes of Monte Morris and Jameel McKay. At the end of the day they need to feed the ball to Georges Niang and let the offense initiate through him and Morris. Possessions that end up with a Nader fade away or a McKay isolation are wasted possessions in my book. If they can get Niang 20 shots a game I will be pleased going forward. Iowa State has struggled so far to get to the free throw line. Part of that might be their ability to keep opponents off the line. Referees are human and have an innate tendency to even out the fouls no matter the situation. One guy that could help get into the bonus is Abdel Nader. If he could attack the rim under control he would be a foul drawing machine.
Coaching
I feel for Coach Prohm. I truly do. He has the toughest job in college basketball this season. I think Prohm has handled himself really well this season, but his hands are a bit tied. There is still that "step-dad" feel and he has done everything in his power to make sure the players get the credit and he takes the blame. It is time for the players to buy in if they want to get where they want to get. My biggest pet peeve from the Prohm era is his tendency to call timeouts when his team is about to make a run and his tendency to call time outs too late into an opponents run.
Going Forward
I think the Cyclones can right the ship and start playing well again. They will lose more games, they will win more games. Getting back to .500 in conference is their first priority and it won't be an easy task. I can see the Cyclones going 10-8 in conference play and finishing with 21 or 22 wins. Their seed will depend on their success in the Big 12 tournament however, whatever it may I don't think many teams will be happy to see them in their bracket.
I hope my optimism is proven true over the next two months. Enjoy the ride Cyclone fans.
**1:20 PM edit
Hallice Cooke has been suspended for today's game leaving them with 6 players in the rotation. Does Jordan Ashton get a look? One can only hope he is able to come in and knock down some shots.
Adjusting Expectations
Expectations are a funny thing. The higher they are as a fan, the more miserable you generally become. The higher the expectations, the less room there is to outperform them. As a Cubs fan, last season was incredibly enjoyable. The Cubs weren't supposed to be a playoff team yet. They outperformed their expectations and it made it a blast to watch. This year, the expectations will be much higher. Losses will hurt more and wins won't feel as good because they are supposed to win. This year, the fans that follow ISU basketball have fallen victim to their own expectations. During the summer the fan base was buzzing with Big 12 championship and Final Four talk. It only gained more steam in a snowball effect as experts came out with their projected Final Four participants and preseason Top 10 lists. ISU climbed all the way up to #2 in the polls and even earned a couple first place votes while compiling wins in the non-conference that weren't convincing enough for the fan base. So, after 3 losses in 4 games have fans adjusted their expectations? Yes, they have. Some are calling this team a bubble team and would be surprised to see them make the tournament. What?! Look the 'Clones are probably out of the Big 12 regular season championship talk. That could be a blessing in disguise. Lets look at some realistic expectations going forward.
The NCAA tournament is a complete crap shoot. The very nature of this caused havoc on Cyclone Nation last March and could cause euphoria this March. Its just the way it is. I think its tough to put expectations on a team that say they should advance to a certain round in the NCAA tournament. For me, I think you can gauge a lot about a season based on the seed they earn in the big dance. Can we reset the goals on the year? Sure, I am going to (for myself anyway). How about a Top 4 finish in the Big 12? I've wanted nothing more than for the Cyclones to dethrone the Jayhawks over this fun four-five year run. They are behind the 8-ball this year. Maybe this leads to less heartache later in the year? How about a "protected" Top 4 seed in the NCAA tournament. The last two years they have been a 3 seed. Granted they have run the table in the Big 12 tournament but this team is still certainly capable of earning a 4 seed in the Big Dance. There are still 14 conference games and a non-conference tilt against Texas A&M left on the schedule. You can look at that as daunting or opportunity. Let's not beat around the bush, this group plays big when the lights are the brightest. Get in the tournament with a somewhat favorable draw and let the cards play themselves out.
Depth
I've never been a big "depth" guy in college basketball. With egos as big as they are, I think it can create more problems than it can solve. That is why I wasn't terribly concerned with the lack of depth coming into the year barring injury. Well, injury happened and it happened to a key cog in the offense and defense. When it comes to an 18 game conference season it has and will rear its ugly head a couple of times. I think it has become a factor with the defense and with some shooting woes (namely Monte Morris). It has made the margin for error thin and those small errors have shown up the last few games. They won't every game, that is my point. This group can score with the best of them and there will be nights when depth, defense and coaching won't come into play. With as bad as the defense and depth have been we are still talking about a couple bounces from 15-1. Hopefully Burton and Cooke start to find their way. Last year there were a couple of games that they don't win without Abdel Nader off the bench. Burton just about provided that spark at Oklahoma. Hopefully he can help close the deal a couple of times over the rest of the season.
Defense
Oh boy. It has been bad recently. Like, Sandlot 2 bad. We knew going into the season it wouldn't be great and it doesn't have to be great. It just has to be average. There are some bad defenders in the bunch, namely Georges Niang. We were convinced Prohm would put his defensive fingerprint on this group. The problem is that he has never been a defensive guru. Under Hoiberg, the plan was to funnel everything to long two point shots. If they get to the rim, they would be meeting Jameel McKay for a block party. Prohm has McKay denying out on the wings and guarding athletics big men away from the basket. This is not his forte. McKay won his Big 12 Defensive Player of the Year award by getting blocks in help defense. I think they need to get back to this in a way. I wouldn't mind seeing a few possessions of zone defense or some other form of junk defense. If they can create enough confusion a couple possessions a game for the opponent to "waste" a trip down the floor that might be just enough for the Cyclones to be able to outscore opponents. Last, dating back to the Chris Babb era ISU would try to eliminate one player a game from the other team by shadowing him for the entire game and not helping off him. Part of the reason ISU has given up so many three pointers this season is their rotations are late and they are left scrambling. Maybe if they aren't helping off one person they end up giving up a two instead of a three or they take a team out of their rhythm by taking away a first, second or third option. Once again, I think there is a solution or maybe even a band-aid good enough to help this team get to where it wants to be. This will never be an elite defensive team, but they don't have to be. Currently, the only thing they are taking away are opponent free throws. I'm asking to just take away one more thing, whatever that might be.
Offense
I agree with some that say the offense hasn't looked as potent as it has in the past, but I think a majority of that comes the fact they aren't shooting as well (or as often) from three point range. I also don't think they are running the break as well as they have in past years. At the end of the day they still have one of the most potent offenses in the country. I think there will be some regression to the mean when it comes to shooting percentages (in a good way) for the likes of Monte Morris and Jameel McKay. At the end of the day they need to feed the ball to Georges Niang and let the offense initiate through him and Morris. Possessions that end up with a Nader fade away or a McKay isolation are wasted possessions in my book. If they can get Niang 20 shots a game I will be pleased going forward. Iowa State has struggled so far to get to the free throw line. Part of that might be their ability to keep opponents off the line. Referees are human and have an innate tendency to even out the fouls no matter the situation. One guy that could help get into the bonus is Abdel Nader. If he could attack the rim under control he would be a foul drawing machine.
Coaching
I feel for Coach Prohm. I truly do. He has the toughest job in college basketball this season. I think Prohm has handled himself really well this season, but his hands are a bit tied. There is still that "step-dad" feel and he has done everything in his power to make sure the players get the credit and he takes the blame. It is time for the players to buy in if they want to get where they want to get. My biggest pet peeve from the Prohm era is his tendency to call timeouts when his team is about to make a run and his tendency to call time outs too late into an opponents run.
Going Forward
I think the Cyclones can right the ship and start playing well again. They will lose more games, they will win more games. Getting back to .500 in conference is their first priority and it won't be an easy task. I can see the Cyclones going 10-8 in conference play and finishing with 21 or 22 wins. Their seed will depend on their success in the Big 12 tournament however, whatever it may I don't think many teams will be happy to see them in their bracket.
I hope my optimism is proven true over the next two months. Enjoy the ride Cyclone fans.
**1:20 PM edit
Hallice Cooke has been suspended for today's game leaving them with 6 players in the rotation. Does Jordan Ashton get a look? One can only hope he is able to come in and knock down some shots.
Tuesday, December 15, 2015
Naz
After reading a couple things on the Naz injury, obviously it hurts for this year. Thomas is a good player and has shown increased confidence and better shooting so far, but there's a reason Naz passed him a couple years ago. Naz was always the one to get in people's faces and be the vocal leader on the floor and that definitely hurts. His ability and willingness to get to the rack so far this year has been undersold.
That said, assuming, and I don't think it's a definite, he gets to come back next year, he'll be the bridge between past successful Cyclone teams and the future. Thomas and maybe Monte would be the only other guys that've actually played more than a year for ISU on next year's team. While the fan base (and that ESPN douche) don't give ISU much of a chance next year, Naz won't let the team slack. Next year's team could really use an old voice on the court and sidelines.
Most great teams have carryover from year to year to year and teams like Kentucky have built in expectations. Without Naz and Monte next year, ISU would have neither. Actually, next year the classes are pretty balanced so any success should be carried into future seasons. I'm excited about the front court depth with Malou, Carter, Ernst and Young. (Ernst and Young is one of the "big 4" accounting firms, look for it on future Cyclone bingo cards)
So while the loss of Naz is a big blow to this year's team, it could possibly be just the thing needed to sustain ISU's success into the future.
Thursday, July 30, 2015
Ten Stats That Will Leave You Optimistic About 2015 Iowa State Football
With college football season right around the corner I figured it was time to re-establish myself on the blog. After some research I've found myself more optimistic than most when it comes to the upcoming ISU football season. Here are ten statistics that will leave you feeling the same.
1) The last coach to go 5-19 over a two year span in Ames (Gene Chizik) won a national championship just two years later. Paul Rhoads is 5-19 in his last two seasons.
2) The incoming freshman class has never lost a Big 12 game. NEVER.
3) Top 10 good? Maybe. ISU finished in the top ten in the Big 12 in EVERY statistical category last season.
4) Playoff?! We're talking about playoffs?! If they get there it's important to note that a likely opponent (Alabama) hasn't beat Iowa State since the 2001 Independence Bowl.
5) Iowa State's only winning season in the last decade was preceded by a winless Big 12 slate the year before. Last season? 0-9 in the Big 12.
6) The Cyclones have now had three 2-10 seasons in their history. In the previous two they responded with seven win seasons including a CHAMPIONSHIP in each of those seasons (2004 Independence Bowl, 2009 Insight Bowl).
7) Lucky #7. Paul Rhoads is entering his 7th season as head coach. The last coach to make it to their seventh season won seven games (Dan McCarney 7-5 in 2001).
8) Las Vegas has Iowa State's odds of winning the Big 12 at 100-1. There are only eight teams with better odds.
9) Last season ISU had a money line of +100000 to win the National Championship. This year? +40000. Remember folks, in this case the lower the number, the better the odds.
10) With the completion of the "South Endzone Project" Jack Trice will now have the third largest capacity in the Big 12 behind Texas and Oklahoma. This new "Big Three" trio of OU, UT and ISU has combined to win 10 out of the last 15 Big 12 championships. As Meatloaf says, "two out of three ain't bad"!
Cyclone fans let me caution you, #AStormIsComing
Sunday, July 26, 2015
Baylor's Hidden Advantage
Art Briles said something interesting at the Big 12 media days, this from an ESPN article:
Art was close with his Texas geography. Technically, Waco is about 100 miles east of the geographic center of Texas, but this puts it right in the middle of the "Texas Triangle" - Houston, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Austin and San Antonio. Waco is only 50 miles from the population center of Texas. A good place to be if you're trying to keep Texas kids in Texas.
How many people are we talking about? We always hear about kids wanting to stay close enough for their families to see them play, which I assumed was within a three-hour drive, or about 200 miles. This also allowed Baylor to be within reach of Houston, D-FW and San Antonio, areas all well-represented on their current roster. This very cool site (http://mcdc.missouri.edu/websas/caps10c.html) allows you to search for population within a radius of any location.
More than 20.3 million people live within 200 miles of Waco. That's a lot of potential recruits. That number is higher than the University of Texas or either of the other Texas schools and roughly two to four times that of the former Big 8 schools. Only West Virginia has a greater population within 200 miles.
Briles on playing in central Texas: "Get your map. Throw a dart. Try to hit the middle. It's gon' be right around Waco."
Briles on recruiting in Texas: "If I was coaching at Ouachita Baptist in Arkansas or at San Jose State, that would be my priority also. Which it is, for everyone, every university in the nation. Texas is the most heavily recruited state. That's what makes it so invigorating as a recruiter and football program to keep kids here."
Briles on winning over the target demographic: "We're a young brand. You ask somebody [age] 10 to 30 who's the best football team in the Southwest part of the United States -- you know, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, New Mexico, the bordering states around here. They're going to say Baylor. Now 30 to 60, you might get a different answer. And 60 to 90 may be different. But those young kids, they associate with Baylor. That's something that's working for us."Both Baylor's football and basketball programs have risen to national relevancy over the past five or so years. Baylor is a small private school, with no national following and not much local support to speak of. So how did this happen? Briles' statements will lead us to some interesting answers.
Art was close with his Texas geography. Technically, Waco is about 100 miles east of the geographic center of Texas, but this puts it right in the middle of the "Texas Triangle" - Houston, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Austin and San Antonio. Waco is only 50 miles from the population center of Texas. A good place to be if you're trying to keep Texas kids in Texas.
How many people are we talking about? We always hear about kids wanting to stay close enough for their families to see them play, which I assumed was within a three-hour drive, or about 200 miles. This also allowed Baylor to be within reach of Houston, D-FW and San Antonio, areas all well-represented on their current roster. This very cool site (http://mcdc.missouri.edu/websas/caps10c.html) allows you to search for population within a radius of any location.
More than 20.3 million people live within 200 miles of Waco. That's a lot of potential recruits. That number is higher than the University of Texas or either of the other Texas schools and roughly two to four times that of the former Big 8 schools. Only West Virginia has a greater population within 200 miles.
Also worth noting is Baylor has the highest surrounding population growth of any of the Big 12 schools. Their recruiting base is growing at a faster rate. There really are millions of kids and young adults growing up in and moving to the region for whom Texas' and Oklahoma's dominance is a fading memory. Baylor has more recently won a Big 12 championship (2), had a top 10 finish and Heisman winner than either UT or OU. For kids in high school today, it isn't "Baylor is Baylor is Baylor" anymore. Basketball is even more wide open in the state of Texas than football.
Baylor capitalized on the opportunity in a big way. The two head coaches seem to be perfect fits for the school, and are committed to signing Texas talent. The school secured donations based on the recent success to build a brand new football stadium, which will undoubtedly attract more fans, players and money.
Coda: 27 million people?!? I thought West Virginia was in the sticks?
We forget how much closer metropolitan areas are on the east coast than the rest of the nation. Morgantown is no metropolis, indeed the whole population of West Virginia is only 1.8 million. However, included within a 200 mile radius are Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Columbus, Richmond Virginia, Washington D.C, and Baltimore. This is undoubtedly what attracted the Big 12 to WVU when it came to TV revenues.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)