Saturday, March 8, 2014

All Big 12 teams updated March 7th


I'll be honest, I don't love the picks here.  Kane and Ejim are locks for the first team.  And Staten deserves a spot too.  The prevailing opinion is that Wiggins and Embiid are both on the first team as well.  I'd concede Wiggins, as he's been solid, contributing in every statistical category except assists.  I don't fully understand the love for Embiid.  Statistically, his season is pretty similar to Isaiah Austin's last year, which landed Austin on the second team.

Of Brown, Hield and Anderson I think one makes the first team instead of Embiid and I'd guess it's Hield, rewarding OU for their good season.

I still like Smart on the second team.  He'd be a no-brainer for first team if he'd played all season, but the suspension has to count for something.  

All five Cyclone starters are on this list, and I don't think that's unreasonable.  I like Monte on the third team and with two on the first, Niang on the third balances that out a bit.  Houge has been incredibly consistent down the stretch but pretty quiet too.  There are only seven or eight guys who should be in the running for honorable mention tomorrow.

If an Iowa State player is going to be picked Big 12 POY, my vote is still for Kane.  He's produced at the same level as Smart did last year, if not a little higher.  Ejim is a great story, and it'd still be great for ISU but Kane was far and away the best player this year.

Like I said above, I like the people I've got on this list, and in general where they are placed but it looks like I'll need to do some tweaking to my formulas.  I think this year is going to turn out to be a little bit of an anomaly in that there are a bunch of guards producing highly in multiple categories and unfortunately a few of them that aren't playing for great teams.  Depending how it shakes out, I could make the team ranking more important, give Wiggins and Embiid a bump for being lottery picks next year, or maybe try to adjust based on team tempo vs. average tempo of the conference.  

Monday, March 3, 2014

Updated All Big 12 Teams - March 2nd

Here are the updated all-big 12 teams as of March 2nd.


It's looking like a two-man race between ISU's stars for Big 12 POY.  I've actually got Kane well out in front and the top three way ahead of anyone else.  Ejim's got more publicity lately and the Academic All-American award, but I'd still vote for Kane.

For Marcus Smart, I calculated his averages based on all 16 games, instead of the 13 he actually played.  I figure it was his fault he missed the 3 games (not because of injury).  He's been one of the top 3 or 4 players in the conference outside of those three games so I think second or third team is a fair spot.

I'd love to see Monte make the third team but I doubt it will happen.  Monte is now top 6 in assists, steals and top 10 in minutes played for a team in a big tie for 2nd place.  He's actually very, very close to Georges in my ratings.

No other surprises here.  Wiggins makes it onto the first team, Embiid is on the second team, where he should be.  OU and UT are well represented.  KSU might slip another player on and ISU or KU will likely drop one.  

I've got to keep touting Kyan Anderson.  He is the ONLY thing going on for TCU right now.  Watching them play the Cyclones, he was active in the first half (~50% utilization I'd guess) and it was a tight game.  After half he disappeared and the Horned Frogs disappeared too.

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Midseason Thoughts on the Cyclones

Melvin Ejim.  I don't know what to say.  He had 70 points and 30 boards in the two games this week.  Dude has come a crazy long way in his four years.  Starter as a freshman, "glue guy" as a sophomore, leading rebounder as a junior, top of the conference in scoring as a senior.  I'd like to hear of another player that made step-change improvement from each year to the next like Melvin.  He's been overlooked and under appreciated through his career so far.  He has been, and will continue to be, a great ambassador for Iowa State.

Fred Hoiberg (and Doc Sadler, presumably) found a new way to beat the zone.  Early in the game against TCU, ISU was settling for long jumpers, and this might have worked given their three point shooting, but late in the first half and throughout the second half, the Cyclones began to run the oop play to Melvin.  This is a look I hadn't seen exploited against the zone, certainly not by ISU.  Even though they don't have much of a post presence, the Cyclones will likely face a zone look in the NCAA tournament.  It's great to know they don't have to be dropping threes to defeat it.

Georges Niang feeding alley oops to Ejim was a thing of beauty.  Georges was the TALLEST player on the court for ISU and is dropping dimes like that.  Then he took someone off the top of the key on the dribble and made it to the basket.  He isn't Royce White, but he is so creative.  Oh, and he's the best interview in the Big 12.  He's must watch footage when he's up there in the post game.  He's a trip, and I can't think of a better person to build a team around.

Morris is a stud.  He's a 40 minute a night player from here on out.  He's putting up some decent numbers while deferring to everyone else on the court.  You can see he's got the court vision to put up even more assists and can get into the lane at will.  Sorry Clayton Custer, you might not see a lot of PT next year. 
 
Happy to have Hogue for another year.  He makes some athletic plays.  A lot of exciting frontcourt options next year with him Niang, Nader and Mckay.
 
I don't think Naz plays as good of defense as everyone seems to think.  That's probably had more effect on his playing time than his poor shooting of late.  His move from bench to starter to bench really seems to have set him back.  If we were second guessing things, Fred would have moved Monte to start instead of Naz and let Naz and Thomas come off the bench.

Thomas has finally found his stroke.  As a freshman, it's not surprising to see him defer when he was playing with Kane, Ejim, and Niang.  He seems to understand when he comes off the bench he's the third option and in there to shoot. He pulls the trigger more willingly.  Two of five threes made like against TCU is a great goal for him.  Tyrus spoiled us.  He was a special shooter (and should have played more).  Jake Sullivan was that kind of shooter when he came in too.  The expectations for Matt have been too high.  Great players in high school aren't scoring 30 a game from behind the arc.  Players like Thomas and Monte had to score in all types of ways.to lead their teams.  It's not just the competition, but the roles to which take some adjusting.  In Matt's case, being a pure shooter.  In Monte's case, being a pure point guard.  Monte is ahead of the curve but there's no reason Thomas can't fill his role too.  *off soap box* 
 
While listening on Monday I started to doubt.  Didn't know if they had enough talent to get over the hump in games like that against OSU.  I learned my lesson.  Every team Hoiberg has is better than the last.  If this team can beat a ranked Big 12 opponent on the road, it can play with anyone on a neutral floor. 

Everyone has high expectations for the Cyclones.  Getting into the NCAA tournament isn't a question, it's about seeding now.  And if they get a 2, 3 or 4 seeding, expectations will be at a level not seen since the early 2000's.  I've been playfully talking about Dallas but if you heard Fred last year, he thought ISU could have made it to the Final Four.  I think having the "tough" part of the conference schedule early will help them, as they can work on some things down the stretch.  Playing the rest of the Big 12 should be the caliber of opponents they should face in the first couple games of the NCAA's.  

Since every "good" sports article has to have a definitive though, here's mine:

ISU finishes second in the Big 12 and makes it to the Elite 8.  Everything else is just gravy.

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Midseason All Big 12 Teams

ISU has hit the mid-way point of the Big 12 conference season. Time to update the all Big 12 teams. All stats are conference-only, through February 4th.
DeAndre Kane is still my Big 12 Player of the Year, leading in the narrowest of margins over Marcus Smart. Kane's numbers are a bit lower in conference play than in the non-conference but are still plenty impressive considering the first half of the Cyclones schedule figures to be much harder than the second. Smart being in the hunt for POY seems to be a surprise, since he and OSU have struggled of late. He contributes, like Kane, in nearly every category. This race will go down to the wire.

As I said in the non-conference update, Ejim is playing out of his mind. His scoring is still strong (2nd in conference) and he's put a renewed emphasis on rebounding (5th in the conference). The top four players are well ahead of the rest of the pack. If he keeps up his numbers, there's no way he gets kept off the first team.

If Kane doesn't win POY, he'll win newcomer. Otherwise it's between Wiggins and Embiid. There's no one else even close.

At this point I've got Niang and Houge on the third team. I'd be a bit surprised if ISU gets four out of the top 15 spots, so I'd guess Niang ends up on the third team and Houge gets honorable mention.

-I don't think Kansas gets shut out of the first team. They'll win the Big 12. Spots 5 through 10 are all really tight. Wiggins makes it. Either because he's a top 5 pick or because his numbers get a little better as their schedule lightens up. Depending how this shakes out, I might have to start giving bonus points for being a projected lottery pick (see Ben McLemore last year).

-ISU and OSU are overrepresented based on their standings right now. The Cyclones will crank off a bunch of wins over the last nine games, and will be in the race for second. Who knows what's up with the Cowboys. It should be noted that my individual rankings incorporate team standing.

-Overall I feel good about who and where everyone is on these teams. No obvious omissions or overrated players.

-Eron Harris (media preseason all-big 12 pick) is just barely ahead of Monte Morris.

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Mangino Gives Big Boost to ISU Offense

From the moment I learned Courtney Messingham would not be retained as ISU's Offensive Coordinator, I wanted Rhoads to hire Mangino.  I didn't think it would happen but it was a pipe dream of mine.  I saw Mangino take a dormant Kansas football program within a game of the National Championship game.  KANSAS.  He knows his offense and has worked with some of the great coaches in college football in Snyder, Stoops, Leach, just to name a few.  What he brings is instant credibility to an ISU offense that has been inept (to put it nicely).
After a three win season, fans were in the dumps.  Two consecutive wins to end the season helped.  The announcement of a enclosing the south endzone was also a huge lift to the fan base morale.  This is certainly the third boost of good information that Paul Rhoads needed to energize the fan base heading into spring ball.  With probably his best recruiting class ( and many defensive JUCO's), a lot of returners on offense and a home run hire to guide the offense Rhoads has put this team in a position to get back to a bowl game in my opinion.
The Mangino hire doesn't come without risk though.  If there was little risk involved he would still be coaching at Kansas, or maybe even a bigger program by now.  His departure at Kansas was mired by allegations of player mistreatment and his interactions with the media could be rather gruff.  This part worries me, a little bit at least.  I don't think Rhoads will stand for too many shennanigans and Mangino shouldn't have to deal with the media as much now as a coordinator.  I think this risk is worth the reward, especially now that Rhoads has established himself as a head coach.
If you think about the staff Rhoads has now assembled on the offensive side of the football, it bodes well.  You have three former offensive coordinators and a former BCS level head coach and coaches that have seen the ins and outs of programs like Oklahoma, Kansas State, Arkansas, Nevada (with Kapernick), and Northwestern to name a few.  There is certainly a plethora of ideas on that side of the ball.  The key is meshing them all together.
The key going forward on this side of the ball is making it Mangino's.  Rhoads needs to take a hands-off approach to the offensive side of the ball and let Mangino do his thing.  Last year there were too many hands in the cookie jar.  Messingham never really stood a chance if you ask me.  It will be interesting to see if guys like Sturdy and Klenakis can work alongside Mangino or if there is tension in that they didn't get the job.  For Cyclone fans, we certainly hope its the former.
There are still a few questions to be answered on this side of the ball.  Will Mangino coordinate from the tight ends position or the quarterbacks position?  In the past he has always coordinated from the offensive line position.  Once again, will there be tension with Klenakis?  It seems like it is Mangino's choice and he can bring in one of his guys if you will to operate the other spot.  Could another Cyclone come home ala Fred Hoiberg?  The rumors have flown around about Sage Rosenfels and Austin Flynn.  Both have indicated there would be interest in coming back to be a part of the coaching staff.   Flynn even went as far as to say it was his dream to come back to his alma mater.  For me, the next pipe dream is getting Sage on staff.
Sage coming back as a quarterback's coach would bring credibility in recruiting the position and a wealth of NFL experience.  I also think his demeanor would instill more confidence and resolve in the program's quarterbacks.  Will it happen?  Its doubtful, but so was the Mangino hire.  I think Sage is enjoying retirement and he is well respected across the country for his insight into professional football.  Flynn wouldn't be a bad choice either although I would prefer he came in as a wide receiver or tight end coach.
Finally, it is my hope that the result of this is a more stable situation at quarterback.  Rhoads has indicated Rohach will get the first snaps in spring.  To be honest, I don't care who Rhoads thinks is the better quarterback anymore.  It shouldn't matter and he shouldn't be making that decisions anymore.  He has a highly, highly qualified assistant to decide that.  He went to the Orange Bowl with Todd Reesing for heaven's sake.  You brought him in to do a job.  Let him do his job.

In Mark We Trust- 1/7/2014

Monday, January 6, 2014

All Big 12 Update - 2013-14 non-conference

In the future, I'll be using conference games only stats but the record start by ISU got me wondering how our guys stacked up so far.


Reiterating what I said above, this is from only non-conference games, so take it with a grain of salt.  But that said, the Cyclones are well represented, and are about where I'd expect them to finish the year.  Of note, DeAndre Kane finishes as the non-conference Big 12 player of the year - if there was such a thing.  He did win player of the week twice when nobody else did.  The way he fills the stat sheet can't be ignored.  And if the Cyclones finish the year as the top team in the conference, he'll be the favorite for POY.

Kane's toughest competition might come from a player on his own team - Melvim Ejim.  Dustin Hogue has hampered Ejim's rebounding but he's made up for it with scoring, finishing the non-conference as the second highest scorer in the Big 12.  One player on the all big 12 first team is rare enough.  Two players would be unheard of (probably, I didn't look back very far).  I don't see these two getting kept off..

Last year, Marcus Smart didn't win newcomer of the year, and Will Clyburn won it even though he was only on the second team, so Dustin Hogue has to be considered a favorite to win it this year.  The dude is a rebounding machine (tops in the Big 12 this year), and scores enough to gain some points there too. I don't see his contribution slipping any during the conference schedule.

Georges Niang is whom ISU fans want to see with the ball at the end of a close game, but that might not be enough to get recognized by the Big 12 media.  He scores at a decent clip, and his assists are top 10 in the league but altogether it's probably just enough to land on an all Big 12 team.  It'd be a good problem if we're disappointed our fourth player represented only made the third team.  

 - Marcus Smart will be a top 5 player in the league.  Without Markel Brown I think it'll be too difficult for him to repeat as POY.  
 - My man Kyan Anderson has started out hot.  It all depends on where TCU finishes if he's a first team or third team performer.
 - Cory Jefferson is a solid basketball player.  I haven't watched him much, but his numbers are solid.  He's a better player than the much higher profile Isaiah Austin, who isn't even represented in my list above.
 - Kansas players are struggling.  If I didn't know anything about their schedule, I'd say Kansas didn't play anybody in the non-conference and played scrubs a lot of minutes.  But since I do know their schedule, I know they played a LOT of tough competition, and probably played their best players significantly.  Will their stars play better in the conference?
 - There are a lot of people on my list I'd never heard of before.  This tells me a couple things.  The Big 12 continues to have individual talent on every team.  Eight of the ten teams are represented.  It also tells me that everyone is recruiting well (especially OU and Texas), with 8 new players on the list.

This might not tell us everything, but as Iowa State fans, we should feel great about where our team is right now and the talent that Fred is bringing in (Kane and Hogue) and developing (Ejim and Niang).

Saturday, January 4, 2014

1/4 Bracketology

Since last time:  Updated afternoon of 1/6 to reflect new AP and Coaches Poll and Lunardi updated S-Curve

Iowa State notched five more victories since my last report.  Winning the Diamond Head Invite in Hawaii was huge for the team and their resume.  They kept potential bad losses off the resume by advancing to the winner's bracket and they got two wins (Akron and Boise State) that might end up being quality wins by the end of the year.  They also got their first conference win, and conference ROAD win of the year while keeping their perfect record intact.  This group just keeps winning and their play is much more consistent than it was a year ago.  At the beginning of the year I would have been happy with a NCAA tournament appearance.  I underestimated what Kane brought to the table and I underestimated Hoiberg's ability to coach.  I may edit some of these numbers in the morning as there were a couple of upsets today in college hoops.  Anyway, here we go.


Once again, here is my formula:


Computer Average (1/3)

Poll Average (1/3)
Lunardi S-Curve (1/3)

I will also include updated RPI and BPI information as it does matter to the committee but I don't factor it into my formula.


AP Poll (1/5): 9

Coaches Poll (1/5): 7

Poll Average (8)


Rankings indicate a 4 seed on the verge of a 3 seed.  Rankings at the end of the day don't mean everything but need to be looked at due to the human aspect of seeding the field.


Computer Rankings (Sagarin, KenPom, Massey)


All ratings as of 1/4


KenPom: 13th

Sagarin: 4th
Massey: 5th

Computer Average: 7.3


What is important to consider with the computer rankings is KenPom starts with a preseason ranking and the other two are solely based on what has happened this year.  Both have their advantages and both become fairly accurate as the year goes on. **As we progress through the season these rankings continue to become more and more accurate**


Joe Lunardi S-Curve Ranking (1/6): 8 



When we put these numbers into the formula here is what it spits out:


(8+7.3+8)/ 3= 7.76

These number would indicate a 2 SEED in the NCAA tournament.


Another number to look at now is the LiveRPI.  I will use ESPN's insider RPI for this ranking.  As of 1/4 their RPI number is 3 with 3 top 50 wins.


Along with the RPI is the BPI, which is a little better indicator than the RPI.  That number is very impressive at the moment....#1.  That would indicate a #1 OVERALL seed.  Could you imagine?


Big Wins: Michigan, @BYU, Iowa, Boise State, Kansas, Baylor, Oklahoma State

Losses: @KU, @Baylor, @OSU, @OU, @Texas

My Prediction: Overall Regular Season Record (25-5, 13-5 in Big 12)


Tournament Prediction: # 2 Seed vs #15 Seed Western Carolina in Milwaukee


Going undefeated in the non-conference was huge.  I thought they needed to do two of four things in the non-conference (win vs Mich, win @BYU, win vs Iowa, win Hawaii invite) to be in good standing on Selection Sunday.  They did all four and succeeded in keeping a bad loss off their resume.\


I don't think a 3 seed is bumping these guys up too much.  Think about it, they are 13-0 with a decent list of wins.  There are plenty of other programs out there right now struggling.  Iowa State should be thinking conference championship at this point in the season.  I don't see a team with this type of resume being seeded too low.  Now that we are in conference play, there should be more movement in rankings, whats considered a good win, etc.  I look forward to hopefully seeing this team climb up Lunardi's S-Curve.  Until next time, #Hoiball.