Saturday, March 10, 2012

NCAA Tourney Seeding Process May Yield Several Mistakes

According to the BPI found on ESPN Insider here is what the S-Curve should look like by their standards.


SeedFirst rowSecondThirdFourth
1KENTUCKY*SyracuseOHIO STATE*NORTH CAROLINA*
2Michigan StateKansasDukeMISSOURI*
3Wichita StateMEMPHISBaylorWisconsin
4SAINT LOUIS*LOUISVILLE*IndianaGeorgetown
5MarquetteFloridaGonzagaVanderbilt
6NEW MEXICO*CREIGHTONKansas StateAlabama
7TexasMichiganUNLVVirginia
8TempleCaliforniaFlorida StateIowa State
9ConnecticutMURRAY STATEBELMONTCincinnati
10San Diego StateARIZONA*SAINT MARY'SMiami (FL)
11LONG BEACH STATE*PurdueWest VirginiaHARVARD
12Southern MissNorth Carolina StateBrigham YoungLa Salle
13VCUNorthwestern/XavierSeton Hall/IonaNEW MEXICO STATE*
14AKRON*SOUTH DAKOTA STATEDAVIDSONMONTANA
15LEHIGHLOYOLA (MD)LAMAR*UNC-ASHEVILLE
16DETROITVERMONTLIU BROOKLYN/WESTERN KENTUCKYNORFOLK STATE*/MVSU*

You can see that there is some discrepancy between some of our "expert" bracketologists and these rankings.  These rankings take the entire season into account.  Unfortunately it looks like the BPI is consistent with other predictions for the Cyclones.  I am really hoping they can get off that 8/9 line.  ESPN also looked at the most overseeded and underseeded teams.

Overseeded teamProjected seedBPI seedUnderseeded teamProjected seedBPI seed
Michigan37Memphis83
Florida State48Saint Louis84
Saint Mary's710Texas127
San Diego State710Belmont149
You will see once again that the computers are loving Texas.  I'm not sure about a "7" seed for them when Iowa State appears to have a much better resume and is projected for an 8.  I guess Texas did go 2-1 against ISU.  I can see Michigan being seeded well above their ability.  I could even see them bowing out early.  Florida State kind of puzzles me.  Maybe the computers can see through Duke and UNC and know that those wins weren't as good as they seemed.

Just a little food for thought when the brackets are revealed tomorrow afternoon.

No comments:

Post a Comment